06-05-2010, 09:28 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-05-2010, 09:29 AM by meguiarver.)
Under normal circumstances i would have topped jetseal with 5050, which is what i prefer doing, however on this car, with the owner being on a budget and a bit indecisive, he initially opted for just the Jetseal and then asked for a cheaper wax (beats me).
Anyways the Jetseal brought out alot of the metallic flake and the wax added depth to it. Its true what calypso said about the camera and not doing justice to the pics, this car was looking really dull and faded. I was happy with the outcome, however on occassion i do mix things up just so that i know what it will look like or what the outcome would be
Had i had all my products i would have sealed with Wet Mirror polish (which is a sealant right) and topped with petes 53 or 5050. The wet Mirror polish is lovely on cars with an unmistakable mettalic flake in the paint. It kind of brings shine to the flake and depth to the colour , hence bringing out the flake. does this make any sense?
Anyways the Jetseal brought out alot of the metallic flake and the wax added depth to it. Its true what calypso said about the camera and not doing justice to the pics, this car was looking really dull and faded. I was happy with the outcome, however on occassion i do mix things up just so that i know what it will look like or what the outcome would be
Had i had all my products i would have sealed with Wet Mirror polish (which is a sealant right) and topped with petes 53 or 5050. The wet Mirror polish is lovely on cars with an unmistakable mettalic flake in the paint. It kind of brings shine to the flake and depth to the colour , hence bringing out the flake. does this make any sense?